🔻 WATCH FULL VIDEO BELOW🔻
The Six-Pack Charger: A Six-Cylinder, AWD Anomaly in the Muscle Car Pantheon
Once the exclusive domain of rumbling V8s and rear-wheel-drive exhilaration, the American muscle car landscape is undergoing a seismic shift. As the automotive world grapples with the twin pressures of electrification and emissions regulations, traditional powerhouses are being forced to evolve or face obsolescence. In this era of unprecedented change, Dodge’s latest Charger Sixpack emerges not as a purebred descendant of its legendary ancestors, but as a fascinating, if perplexing, interpretation of the muscle car ethos for the 21st century.
My journey with the Charger legacy dates back to the early 2000s, a time when vintage muscle cars, though steadily appreciating, still offered a tantalizing gateway for enthusiasts. I vividly recall the moment my search for a late ’60s Chevrolet Chevelle evaporated. It wasn’t Steve McQueen’s iconic Mustang fastback in Bullitt that captured my imagination, but the sinister, triple-black 1968 Dodge Charger R/T, piloted by the film’s antagonist. The apocryphal tale of how racer Max Balchowsky had to heavily modify the Mustang’s 390 V8 just to keep pace with the 440-powered Charger only amplified the legend. This narrative eventually led me to procure my own big-block ’68 Charger, a magnificent beast that, in retrospect, spent a significant portion of its existence on a mechanic’s lift rather than gracing public roads. The passage of time hasn’t diminished the fondness for that machine.
Following a series of Fox-body Mustangs and a rotation of more pragmatic vehicles better suited to the daily grind of Los Angeles traffic, I found myself drawn back to the Mopar family with the 2009 reintroduction of the Dodge Challenger. A crucial non-negotiable for me was the availability of a manual transmission, a feature happily offered on both the 2009 SRT8 and the then-new R/T models. For years, that black R/T served as my daily driver, a period that coincided with my transition into the realm of automotive journalism. Despite the privilege of piloting an eclectic array of high-performance machinery during this tenure, I ultimately parted with the R/T to upgrade to a manual-equipped Challenger SRT Hellcat. The Hellcat, in essence, was the physical embodiment of the wild, imaginative doodles that populated the margins of my high school math notebooks—a brash, excessive, and gloriously unhinged machine that resonated on a primal level.
The very definition of a muscle car has been a subject of fervent debate for decades, yet to my mind, the criteria remain relatively straightforward: a rear-wheel-drive, front-engine, intermediate-sized car endowed with a potent V8 engine. Ideally, the vehicle should also exude an unapologetic extroversion, possess a slightly unhinged dynamic character, and offer the option of a manual transmission. The current iteration of the Dodge Charger Sixpack fails to meet virtually every one of these traditional benchmarks. However, it does draw inspiration from other, perhaps less obvious, facets of the Charger’s extensive heritage, a point to which we shall return.
Even the full-sized LX-platform Chargers that preceded the latest generation skirted the edges of the traditional muscle car definition. Yet, they largely received a pass from the motoring public and critics alike. The prevailing rationale was that contemporary consumer preferences simply do not support the volume necessary for automakers to justify developing multiple rear-drive passenger car variants across various segments. Furthermore, Dodge, at the time, seemed to genuinely understand the assignment. Times have shifted dramatically, however, and in the wake of Dodge’s recent identity crisis, I find that the muscle car concept has been stretched to a breaking point.
Dodge currently touts the Charger as the most powerful muscle car available on the market. While it is factually accurate that certain versions of the latest Charger surpass the Ford Mustang Dark Horse in raw output figures, I am compelled to question the metrics Dodge is employing to classify the Charger Sixpack as a muscle car.
Now positioned alongside the all-electric Charger Daytona EV, every version of the Sixpack is propelled by a 3.0-liter twin-turbocharged Hurricane inline-six engine. This forced-induction mill generates a formidable 420 horsepower in the R/T models, while the Scat Pack variants benefit from a high-output version that churns out a staggering 550 horsepower. A significant departure from its predecessors, all current Charger models come standard with all-wheel drive, and all are paired exclusively with automatic transmissions (or, in the case of the Daytona EV, a single-speed direct-drive unit). Considering that the Charger Sixpack is both nearly a foot and a half longer and approximately 1,000 pounds heavier than the Mustang, the notion of them being direct competitors becomes increasingly difficult to sustain.
The “Bludicrous” Charger Sixpack Scat Pack, the specific configuration I recently had the opportunity to evaluate, possesses an undeniable charisma. Its exterior styling pays homage to the second-generation Charger in several commendable ways, successfully capturing the menacing aesthetic that defined the model’s golden era. The interior design represents a substantial leap forward from the utilitarian layouts of the LX cars. This improvement is attributable not only to the integration of modernized digital interfaces but also to a marked enhancement in overall ergonomics. However, a curious observation during my evaluation was that this ostensibly performance-oriented model, equipped with an array of desirable optional features, was delivered to me here in Los Angeles riding on all-season tires and a suspension system fitted with conventional, non-adaptive dampers.
A few minutes spent navigating the vehicle’s online configurator revealed a notable limitation: as of now, there is no option to equip the Charger Sixpack with adaptive dampers, summer-performance tires, or the more track-focused Competition suspension package. These very components are readily available for the Charger Daytona EV. Consequently, during a recent head-to-head comparison of instrumented test metrics against a similarly priced Mustang Dark Horse, the Sixpack found itself outgunned on almost every front.
To its credit, the Charger Sixpack is a significantly more accommodating vehicle for daily living. Its substantial dimensions translate directly into a cavernous cabin and an abundance of cargo space, providing a level of practicality that few performance coupes can match. Pleasingly, there remains a sufficient complement of physical controls to manage essential functions with ease, allowing the driver to maintain focus on the road ahead without being overly reliant on touchscreen interfaces. The suspension tuning is similarly pragmatic, achieving a commendable balance between ride comfort and body control during routine driving scenarios. And while its vocalizations possess a somewhat nasal timbre, reminiscent of a BMW rather than a Dodge, the high-output Hurricane engine delivers a robust surge of power with remarkably little turbo lag.
The character of the vehicle shifts dramatically, however, when the driver attempts to drive with more vigor. Without the benefit of adjustable dampers to manage the chassis’s dynamics, the sensible, comfort-oriented suspension tuning results in pronounced instances of dive under braking, squat during acceleration, and body roll when cornering. Compounding this, a soft brake pedal feel and tires that readily surrender their grip when subjected to enthusiastic cornering inputs create the impression of a car that is fundamentally uninterested in being pushed to its limits.
The aforementioned optional upgrades—adaptive dampers, summer tires, and a Competition suspension—would undoubtedly make a substantial difference in the vehicle’s dynamic capabilities. Nevertheless, it is my contention that the Charger Sixpack’s sheer size and weight will always present an inherent limitation when compared to most other similarly priced performance coupes. For this reason, I believe Dodge is doing the Charger Sixpack a disservice by continuing to market it as a muscle car. Instead, the automaker should fully embrace and celebrate what the car actually is: a personal luxury vehicle.
The concept of the personal luxury car, while dating back to the 1920s, truly came into its own during the 1970s with the emergence of iconic models such as the Buick Riviera, Ford Thunderbird, and Chrysler Cordoba. Setting aside the obligatory Corinthian leather jokes that have become synonymous with the Cordoba, these massive coupes offered buyers a compelling combination of style and the suggestion of performance, while ultimately prioritizing comfort and luxurious appointments over outright dynamic capability.
This historical context aligns remarkably well with the inherent strengths of the two-door Charger Sixpack. It boasts head-turning styling, a spacious and luxuriously appointed interior, a compliant ride quality, and a smooth, unobtrusive powertrain that is, by design, more content to work harmoniously in the background rather than dominate the driving experience. Furthermore, this repositioning would not be an unprecedented departure for the Charger nameplate. The fourth-generation Charger SE, which shared its platform architecture with the Chrysler Cordoba, adopted a similarly luxury-focused persona during the mid-1970s. To further capitalize on the Charger Sixpack’s new market positioning, Dodge could draw extensively from the Ram and Jeep parts bins, incorporating high-end features such as massaging seats, premium McIntosh audio system components, and opulent upholstery materials.
The current Charger Sixpack may not possess the same crystal-clear definition of purpose that characterized the black R/T as it tore through the streets of San Francisco over half a century ago. However, with a few judicious refinements to the options configurator and a strategic recalibration of the marketing approach, it could very well become the catalyst for a modern resurgence of a different, yet equally compelling, automotive category.
